Inherited IRAs in bankruptcy
A substantial portion of the trillions
of dollars that will be transferred through the estates of baby boomers in the
coming decades is expected to be in IRAs, qualified retirement plans and other
tax-preferred accounts. IRA rollovers
have grown significantly as workers have moved their 401(k) money at retirement
in order to extend its tax-deferred status. Planning for the inheritance of
this money is assuming greater and greater importance. In particular, can this money be shielded
from the claims of beneficiaries’ creditors?
The
U.S. Supreme Court has held that, in general, the anti-alienation rules of
federal pension law put the money that is saved in qualified retirement plans
beyond the reach of creditors in bankruptcy. However, that law does not apply to IRAs. State spendthrift statutes do, however, come
into play, with mixed results.
The
Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 revisited the
rules, adding an exemption for “retirement funds.” Under Bankruptcy Code §522(n), the exemption
for a Roth IRA or a traditional IRA may be limited to $1 million in some
circumstances. However, the term
“retirement funds” was not defined in the Act.
What about an inherited IRA? Does
it constitute “retirement funds” when the beneficiary did not contribute the
money to the account?
New
case
Marilynn and James Mathusa
inherited an IRA when Marilynn’s mother died.
A trustee-to-trustee transfer moved the money to an inherited IRA in
their names. When the couple declared
bankruptcy, they sought to protect the IRA money from the claims of their
creditors.
Some
courts have held that for the “retirement funds” exception of the bankruptcy
code to apply, the funds must be the person’s own savings, and an inheritance
falls outside the scope of the intended protection. Other courts have focused on the literal
language, holding that because an inherited IRA retains its tax-deferred status
for income tax purposes, the statutory requirements have been met. The decision in the Mathusa case, decided in Florida
on March 28, 2011, went the latter way, exempting the IRA from creditor claims.
When
the inheritance is an IRA, the heir accepts the burden of future income taxes
along with the legacy. But this case
shows that the IRA may have built-in asset protection features that offset the
tax negatives. State bankruptcy laws
vary, and in many states this issue hasn’t even been addressed as yet. Before making any irreversible financial
decisions with important tax consequences, be sure to seek professional
counsel.
(May 2011)
© 2011 M.A. Co. All rights reserved.